Immigration and the presidential debate

Lawyers are not necessary for immigration law- or at least that is what presidential candidate Mr. Romney thinks. Well, I guess I should watch out for my job if he gets elected!

What can we expect from each of the candidates according to tonight’s debate?

Mr. Romney has a big focus on skilled immigrants and entrepreneurs. He wants to staple green cards to every foreign student’s passport. Generally this would be and is music to my ears since I am a big supporter of the STEM and Start-Up Act (as my regular readers would know). However, self-deportation? Who wants to self-deport themselves to a country in which they have never lived? He will not support any amnesty he says and criticized president Obama for failing to introduce legislation in his first term.

President Obama on the other hand reminded people what he has done already- he reminded people about the lower fees introduced for immigration forms, he reminded people that there is better border control, and he reminded us that he has done whatever he can administratively on his own.  He reminded people that Mr. Romney does not support the Dream Act and that the person behind Arizona’s new immigration laws is one of Mr. Romney’s advisors. And that even President Bush was a proponent of Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

While both agree comprehensive immigration reform is necessary to fix the system, who do you believe will actually reform the system in a way that brings benefits to the greater good of the country and people?

As an immigrant and a recent US citizen myself (who is looking forward to voting for the first time!), I am still trying to understand how this political system works. And, from what I can understand, if Congress doesn’t help get a bill through, presidents can’t seem to do much on their own.   It is for this reason I applaud President Obama for taking administrative actions, such as prosecutorial discretion to allow people with US citizen families who are not a threat to society to be low priority for deportation, for people in same-sex relationships to be treated as relatives, to allow undocumented young people to receive deferred action and get employment authorization, to introduce Start-Up America and help people get self-employed H1bs.  So I don’t blame president Obama for the lack of comprehensive immigration reform. I  think he needs another term to be able to bring lasting change, for the better, on the immigration front.

In my view, the immigration part of the debate at least was a score to the president!

*Copyright 2012 by Watson Immigration Law. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

3 Responses to “Immigration and the presidential debate”


  1. 1 Ram October 19, 2012 at 11:09 am

    You said president “helped people get self-employed H1bs” – really ? can you do that now ? As far as I know its not possible until Start up act is passed.

  2. 3 Ram October 19, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    I did not know this! this is great – Thanks! I will research more and email you in case i need more information.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Archives

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 541 other followers

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 541 other followers

Please note this blog is not intended for individual legal advice

Copyright @ Watson Immigration Law. Copying/republishing not permitted. Quoting is permitted with link to this blog.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 541 other followers

%d bloggers like this: